SURESH KUMAR,BAHADRABAD, HARIDWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, HARIDWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted the additional evidence filed by the assessee, finding them crucial for deciding the issue. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for examination of these evidences.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order. The assessee also filed a petition for admission of additional evidence, including affidavits, bank statements, and medical certificates.
What were the issues?
Whether additional evidence submitted by the assessee should be admitted and examined by the AO for a fair adjudication of the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN “DB” BENCH, DEHRADUN
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
PER MANISH AGARWAL, A.M.:
The present appeal is filed by assessee against the order dated 14.01.2026 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”] in Appeal No. NFAC/2015- 16/10334155 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising out of the assessment order dated 01.02.2024 passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17.
ITA 135/DDN/2026 SURESH KUMAR
Heard the contentions of both parties at length and perused the material available on record. The assessee has filed a petition under Rule 29 of the ITAT Rules for admission of additional evidences which are the affidavits and bank statements of mother and brother of the assessee and also submitted medical certificate and Lekhpal certificate, the same are placed at paper book pages 252 to 271 of the paper book. Since these documents are crucial in nature to decide the issue in hand and therefore, in the larger interest of justice, we admit the additional evidences filed by the assessee. At this stage examination of the additional evidences filed is not possible thus we remand the matter back to the file of AO with the direction to examine the additional evidences filed vis-à-vis the additions made. The assessee is also directed to appear before the AO and explain all the facts in respect of sources of cash deposited. With these directions, all Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 07.08.2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) (MANISH AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Date-07.08.2026 *Amit Kumar, Sr. P.S*
ITA 135/DDN/2026 SURESH KUMAR
Copy to: SURESH KUMAR, KALI MANDIR CHOWK, NEAR BUS STAND, 1 BAHADRABAD, HARDWAR-249402, UTTARAKHAND INCOME TAX OFFICER, 2 YOGI BHAWAN, INDUSTRIAL AREA, HARDWAR-249401, UTTARAKHAND 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, DEHRADUN BENCH 5 GUARD FILE
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026