DHANANJAY SHASHIKANT VAKHARIA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(2)(6), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT condoned the delay in filing the appeal, set aside the CIT(A)'s ex-parte order, and restored the matter to the AO. The AO was directed to consider the assessee's request for DVO reference under Section 50C(2) and pass a fresh speaking order.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared LTCG from property sale, but the AO reopened the assessment under Section 147, alleging escaped income due to higher stamp duty valuation. The assessee's representative requested a reference to the DVO under Section 50C(2), which was not acted upon. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte for non-prosecution.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without a speaking adjudication, and whether the AO erred in not referring the matter to the DVO under Section 50C(2) as requested by the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 50C,Section 50C(2),Section 250(6),Section 253(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by the order of first-appeal dated 30.04.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of the assessment-order passed by learned ITO, Ward-1(2)(6), Surat [“Ld. AO”] u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 & 144B(8) of Income-tax Dhananjay Shashikant Vakharia Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2015-16, the assessee has filed this appeal on following grounds:
“1. On the facts and circumstances of the case as well as law on
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026