SHRI KAMLESH GUPTA,LUCKNOW vs. THE ACIT, RANGE-1, LUCKNOW
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an increase in sales does not automatically justify an addition, especially when books of account are accepted and sales proceeds are already recorded. Sustaining an addition on estimation without specific defects in books is not permissible.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trader, made cash deposits during demonetization. The Assessing Officer (AO) added a portion of these deposits as unexplained, viewing them as not substantiated by increased sales. The CIT(A) partially deleted the addition but sustained a Rs. 20,00,000 addition.
What were the issues?
Whether cash deposits during demonetization, linked to sales, can be treated as unexplained income when books of account are not rejected and sales are recorded. Whether a partial addition can be sustained on an estimated basis without specific defects.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW
Before: SHRI. SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA & SHRI NIKHIL CHOUDHARY
PER BENCH:
These are cross-appeals by the assessee as well as the Revenue against the order dated 23.09.2020, passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Lucknow [Ld. CIT(A)] for Assessment Year 2017-18. 2.0 The brief facts of the case are that the assessee was a trader engaged in wholesale as well retail business of consumer
ITA No.448/LKW/2020 goods, like Agarbattis, Dhoop Batties, Bidi, Cigarette, Match box, Mineral Water, Mouth Freshner, etc. under the proprietary concern ‘M/s Shree Maa Vaishno Devi Trading Company’. The assess
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026