NEOVANTAGE INNOVATION PARK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ITO, WARD -16(3), HYDERABAD
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in developing life sciences parks, filed its return declaring nil income after setting off brought forward unabsorbed depreciation. The Assessing Officer (AO) made transfer pricing adjustments on interest paid on Compulsorily Convertible Debentures (CCDs) and other additions, including disallowing set-off of unabsorbed depreciation.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the issue of unabsorbed depreciation set-off requires verification of the demerger scheme and the quantum of depreciation transferable. It restored the matter to the AO for verification and determination of the eligible set-off.
What were the issues?
Whether the transfer pricing adjustment on interest paid on CCDs is justified and whether the set-off of unabsorbed depreciation is allowable based on a demerger scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92CA,Section 94B,Section 72A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Ravish SoodShri Madhusudan Sawdia
Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.:
This appeal is filed by Neovantage Innovation Park Private Limited (“the assessee”) against the final assessment order dated 02.01.2026 passed by the Learned Assessing Officer (“Ld. AO”) under section 143(3) read with sections 144C(13) and 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”), pursuant to the directions issued by the Learned Dispute Resolution Panel (“Ld. DRP”) under section 144C(5) of the Act for Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
5
9
The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 3453/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment… vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6805/MUM/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Tbea Green Energy (India) Private Limited… vs ACIT, Central Circle 1, Vadodara, GujaratITA 592/AHD/2026[2022-2023]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-2023
- At&T Communication Services India Private… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 5593/DEL/2024[AY 2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jitin Batra Proprietor Of M/S. Dreamz Conference And Event Management Group vs. Sales Tax Officer Class Ii / Avato Ward 60 & Ors.Delhi · 7 Oct 2026
- Madhusudan Saraogi vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Howrah And Kadamtala Charge And Ors.Calcutta · 7 Oct 2026
- Neeraj Massey vs. Assistant CommissionerUttarakhand · 7 Oct 2026
- Padu Paraja vs. The Commnr. Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- The Lead Factory vs. The Assistant Commissoner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 7 Oct 2026