THAMBIRAN SUBBIAH SUBRAMANIAN,THENI vs. ITO, WARD-1, THENI
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file an income tax return. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment after receiving information about the sale of immovable property and cash advance. The AO made an addition under Section 50C, and the CIT(A) provided partial relief.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the notice issued under Section 148 was invalid because it was issued beyond three years from the end of the relevant assessment year without obtaining approval from the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (PCCIT) as required by Section 151(ii). Consequently, the assessment proceedings were vitiated.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated by a notice under Section 148 issued beyond three years without the proper sanction from the competent authority as prescribed under Section 151(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 50C,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 151,Section 250,Section 263,Section 292BC
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & MS. PADMAVATHY.S
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 25.11.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19. 2. The assessee is an individual and did not file the return of income for the year under consideration. The AO received information that the assessee
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50C
- Krishna Ginning and Pressing Factory… vs DCIT/ACIT Circle 1 (1), RajkotITA 468/RJT/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Malini Satish Parekh, Surat vs ITO, Ward 2(3), SuratITA 900/SRT/2024[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Mehboob Khan, Raosar vs Assessing Officer Ashok Nagar, Ashok NagarITA 621/AGR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Sip Infotech Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 5355/MUM/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2019-2020
- Sudhir Rawat, Jabalpur vs Income Tax Officer Ward-1(3), JabalpurITA 250/JAB/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2011-12
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Bisleri International PVT.LTD, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Revenue Building, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Saraswat Infra And Projects, Sundergarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The State Tax Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Vedvyas Logistics Private Limited, Sundargarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Harilal Agarwalla vs. State Tax Officer, Kendrapara CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026