SHREE KAMKHEDA BALAJI SARVJANIK TRUST,JHALAWAR RAJASTHAN vs. WARD EXEMP UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection was based on procedural deficiencies. Since the assessee is willing to furnish a complete application and documents, the matter should be reconsidered by the CIT(E).
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed an application for registration under section 12A/12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application because Form No. 10AB was incomplete and required documents were not furnished, despite a deficiency letter.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the registration application solely on procedural grounds without considering the merits, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to rectify deficiencies.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 03.02.2026 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the assessee seeking registration under section 12A/12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
The material facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the assessee had filed an application in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under the relevant provisions of section 12A read with section 12AB of the Act. The learned CIT(E),
2 Asst. Year: 2025-26 while examining the application, observed that Form No. 10AB was incomplete and that certain documents/details required to accompany the application had not been furnished. As record
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026