VIVEK MISSION CHARITABLE TRUST,JALAL BATHINDA vs. CIT EXEMPTIONS CHANDIGARH, C R BUILDING HIMALAYA MARG SECTOR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection of the application was based on an inspector's report without providing the assessee an opportunity to rebut the findings, thus violating principles of natural justice. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust running a medical facility, applied for registration under Section 12A. The CIT(E) rejected the application based on an inspector's report alleging fee collection from patients and the operation of an independent medical store from the premises.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the registration application without affording the assessee an opportunity to rebut adverse findings from an inspector's report, and whether the alleged commercial activities were attributable to the trust.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld CIT (E), Chandigarh, dated 20/01/2026, rejecting the application for registration dated 28/08/2025, filed by the assessee in Form 10AB, u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act 1961( henceforth the Act ).
The grounds of appeal taken by the assessee in the memorandum of appeal in form 36 are as follows:
“1. Violation of Principles of Natural Justice That the 1.d. CIT E has erred in law in relying upon the adverse physical inspection report of the Income tax Inspector without furnishing a copy of 1 the said report to the appellant and without granting any 2 Assessment Year: 2026-27
opportunity
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026