GURU NANAK TRUST OF EDUCATION THROUGH ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE SUKHWANT SINGH,AMRITSAR vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that running a school is a charitable activity. It remanded the matter back to the CIT (Exemptions) for fresh consideration, directing the assessee to provide all documentary evidence and cooperate with the proceedings.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12(1)(ac)(vi) of the Income Tax Act to run a school. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the application, doubting the genuineness of activities and financial integrity due to cash deposits from alleged donations from abroad.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration for a charitable trust running a school was justified, and if principles of natural justice were followed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12(1)(ac)(vi),Section 2(15)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AMRITSAR BENCH, AMRITSAR.
Before: SH. S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SH. UDAYAN DAS GUPTA
Per: Udayan Dasgupta, JM: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld CIT (E), Chandigarh, dated 20/03/2025, rejecting the application for registration dated 04/09/2024, filed by the assessee in Form 10AB, u/s 12(1)(ac)(vi)(B) of the Income Tax Act 1961(henceforth the Act).
The grounds of appeal taken in Form No. 36 are as follows:
“1. That the order of Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to facts and on this illegality pervades over all grounds of appeal.
That the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemptions) has erred in law and not judicially applied her mind to the facts and circumstances of the case and as such the rejection of reg
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(15)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026