GUNVANTBHAI NATHUBHAI PATEL,NA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted the assessee's non-compliance but also the lack of adequate opportunity before the CIT(A). It was decided that the matter should be referred to the Departmental Valuation Officer (DVO) for valuation.
What were the facts?
The assessee did not file an income tax return for AY 2012-13. The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment based on information about an immovable property sale, making additions for sale consideration and the difference between sale value and stamp duty value. The CIT(A) confirmed the AO's actions.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment was valid and whether the additions made under Section 50C were justified without a DVO report. The Tribunal also considered the opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 144,Section 50C,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC”
Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini
Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2012- 13, is directed against the order passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi, dated 19.01.2026, which in turn arises out of an order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of the Act, on 30.11.2019. 2. The grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as follows:
On the facts and circumstances of the case as wel
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026