HEMALI BABUBHAI KATORIWALA,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 1(2)(1), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were barred by limitation as the notice under Section 148 was issued beyond the permissible time limits prescribed by law and Supreme Court decisions. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened for AY 2013-14 based on information of escaped income. A notice under Section 148 was issued, and subsequent reassessment order was passed. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated after the prescribed time limits, considering the amendments and Supreme Court rulings on reassessment notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 148A,Section 149,Section 69A,Section 68,Section 271(1)(c)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Bench:
This bunch of eight (8) appeals, consisting of four (4) quantum-appeals and four (4) penalty-appeals, is filed by same assessee; the counsels
ITA No.670/SRT/2025 (AY: 2013-14) & ors. Hemali Babubhai Katoriwala representing in all matters are same and the issues are also identical, hence they are being disposed of by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience.
There is a delay of 47 days in filing all these appeals. H
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026