SHRI SWAMINARAYAN DINDAYAL SEVA TRUST,SURAT vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO's and CIT(A)'s treatment was not justified as the trust was already registered since 1990 and its earlier registration was not cancelled but was a matter of renewal. Therefore, the rejection of the application for renewal was not justified.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust, claimed exemption under Section 11. The Assessing Officer denied this exemption for AY 2021-22, treating the assessee as an AOP/BOI, because the trust's application for new registration under Section 12AA was rejected and the new registration obtained was for subsequent assessment years. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of Section 11 benefits to a trust due to issues with its Section 12AA registration renewal is justified, especially when the trust had prior registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANIShri Swaminarayan Dindayal Seva
PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M:
The appeal filed by the assessee is against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), [in short “CIT(A)”], Delhi dated 07.03.2025 for the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2021-22. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“1. The learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts of the case in making addition of Rs.1,17,05,350/- by denying benefits of section 11 on the ground of alleged non- registration of the assessee Trust for A.Y.2021-22. 2. The appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter the grounds of appeal at the time of hearing, if need arise.”
The assessee is a trust and file
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026