MANOJ VASANTLAL VAIDYA,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3)(3), SURATQ

ITA 783/SRT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Surat10 August 2026AY 2013-147 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals before the CIT(A), citing sufficient cause and a liberal approach. The matter was restored to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication to ensure principles of natural justice.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed appeals before the CIT(A) with significant delays for assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14. The CIT(A) condoned the COVID-19 related delay but not the remaining substantial delay, dismissing the appeals.

What were the issues?

Whether the significant delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A) should be condoned, and if so, whether the matter should be adjudicated on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 249,Section 250,Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC”

Before: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini

For Appellant: Shri P M Jagasheth, CA
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Uke, Ld. Sr. DR
Hearing: 14/05/2026Pronounced: 10/08/2026

Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, AM: Captioned two appeals filed by the same assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2012-13 and 2013-14, are directed against the separate orders passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which in turn arise out of separate assessment orders passed by the assessing officer under section 143(3) of the Act.

2.

At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No.78

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 249

All 507 judgments and leading authorities on Section 249 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →