ASSAM BAPTIST CONVENTION,GOLAGHAT vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX EXEMPTION, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal upheld the order of the CIT(E), finding that the assessee was actively engaged in earning rental income at prevailing market rates on a commercial basis. The scale and nature of the activity indicated a business module, not incidental to charitable objects.
What were the facts?
The assessee society applied for renewal of registration under Section 12A(1)(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application, observing that the society was engaged in commercial activities by letting out its properties on a large scale, which violated the provisions of Section 2(15).
What were the issues?
Whether letting out of property on a large scale at commercial rates constitutes a business activity violating the charitable nature of the institution under Section 2(15) and consequently disqualifying it for registration under Section 12A?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(15),Section 12A(1)(a)(ii),Section 12AB(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “DB” BENCH, GUWAHATI
PER LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
This appeal is filed by the assessee against the orders passed by the CIT (Exemption), Kolkata, [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(E)] dated 31.12.2025, DIN & Notice No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025- 26/1084254826(1) against the rejection of application filed by the assessee for registration u/s 12A(1)(a)(ii) of the Act in Form No. 10AB. The assessee filed an application on 06.05.2025 for renewal of 2 Assam Bapist Convention; A.Y. 2025-26 registration u/s 12(1)(ac)(ii) in form No. 10AB. Accordingly, notice was issued to the assessee on 10.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(15)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- U Days Garments vs. The Adjudication OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S Jsw Cement Limited,Jajpur vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sreeshobi Enterprises vs. The Appellate AuthorityMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- S.T.Promotors vs. The Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 16 Oct 2026
- Prashanti Das (M/S. Panchamukhi Enterprises) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Jagatsinghpur CircleOrissa · 16 Oct 2026