JAMIAT ISLAHUL MUSLEMEEN CHARITABLE SOCIETY,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD-1, EXEMP, NAGPUR, NAGPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals and set aside the CIT(E)'s orders. The matter was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication, granting the assessee one more opportunity to furnish documents and submissions.
What were the facts?
The assessee's applications for registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and approval under Section 80G(5) were rejected by the CIT(E) due to non-compliance with notices. The assessee filed appeals before the ITAT after a significant delay, citing issues with their previous tax consultant.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the applications for registration and approval due to non-compliance, and whether the delay in filing appeals should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, NAGPUR BENCH :: NAGPUR
Before: SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA & SHRI KHETTRA MOHAN ROY
PER KHETTRA MOHAN ROY, AM: These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the separate orders of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune (for short, “CIT(E)”), both dated 22/09/2023; whereby applications for regular registration u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and regularization of approval u/s. 80G(5) have been rejected.
ITA Nos. 425 & 426/NAG/2025 (Jamiat Islahul Muslemeen Charitable Society)
Registry has pointed out that there is a delay of 583 days in filing the present appeals. Assessee has filed applications seeking condonation of the delay. It has been submitted that, after the initial applications were rejected, the erstwhile tax consultant
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026