JYOTI CHALLANI,INDORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-5(1), INDORE, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was non-participative in the appellate proceedings before the CIT(A). Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the matter back for de novo consideration.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 36,15,837/- to the assessee's income as deemed interest on loans advanced without charging interest. The assessee contended that she follows the cash method of accounting and the loans were out of own funds. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's addition.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in upholding the addition of deemed interest without proper adjudication, and whether the assessee's non-participation warranted a remand.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 145(3),Section 250,Section 253,Section 246A,Section 56
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI
Per Paresh M. Joshi, JM:
This is an Appeal filed by the Revenue under section 253 of the Income tax Act 1961,[ herein after referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal. The Revenue is aggrieved by the order bearing No:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-
26/1085071865(1) dated 21.01.2026 passed by the Ld.
CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act which is hereinafter referred as the Jyoti Challani ITA No. 447/Ind/2026 AY-2023-2024 “Impugned Order”. The Relevant Assessment Year is 2023-
2024 and the corresponding Previous Period is from 01/04/2022 to 31/03/2023. 2. FACTUAL MATRIX
1 That as and by way of an Assessment Order made u/s 143(3)
RWS 144B of the Act, th
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 145(3)
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs DCIT Central Circle 2(1), MumbaiITA 1952/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1951/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- M/S. Sarvesh Mercantile Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central…ITA 1950/MUM/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica India Projects Private Limited…ITA 2336/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax… vs Pacifica Builders Private Limited, AhmedabadITA 2335/AHD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026