MAHAMAYA MANDIR,BHOPAL vs. ITO-4(1), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had non-participation in certain hearings before the CIT(A) despite opportunities. However, considering the prayer to set aside the order and remand the matter, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Mahamaya Mandir (an AOP), had cash deposits of Rs. 68,76,081/-. The Assessing Officer disallowed Bhandara expenses of Rs. 11,64,200/- due to discrepancies with COVID-19 lockdown dates and donations of Rs. 1,08,000/- as not eligible expenses. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of Bhandara expenses and donations was justified, and whether the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated and conducted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144B,Section 148A,Section 148,Section 57(iii),Section 250,Section 253,Section 246A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Paresh M Joshi, J.M:
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee under section 253 of the income tax Act 1961,[ hereinafter referred to as the Act
for the sake of brevity] before this tribunal, as & by way of a second appeal .The Assessee is aggrieved by the order
bearing No:-ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1084286260(1)
dated 31.12.2025 passed by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 250 of the Act, which is hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned
order”. The Relevant Assessment year is 2020-21 and the MAHAMAYA MANDIR ITA No. 327/Ind/2026 - A.Y. 2020-21
corresponding previous year period is from 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020. 2. Factual Matrix
1 That as and by way of an Assessment order made u/s 147 RWS 144B of the Act, the t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026