BHAN KISHORE GOSWAMI,BHOPAL vs. BPL/W/92/33/ITO,4(1), BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted additional evidence, including the death certificate and purchase deed, and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for de novo assessment. The AO was directed to bring legal representatives on record and examine the evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was reopened after his death, and the Assessing Officer treated the entire sale consideration of an immovable property as long-term capital gains. The assessee's legal heir informed the AO about the death and claimed the transaction was a purchase, not a sale.
What were the issues?
Whether reassessment proceedings initiated against a deceased person are void ab initio and whether the transaction was a purchase or sale of property.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI PARESH M. JOSHI & SHRI ARVIND SONI
PER ARVIND SONI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
This appeal has been filed by the assessee (through legal
heir Nitin Kishore ) against the order dated 12.02.2024 passed
by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi
[hereinafter referred to as "the ld. CIT(A)"] for Assessment
Year 2011-12 arising out of assessment order framed under Bhan Kishore Goswami section 147 read with section 144 of the Income-tax Act,
1961 ("the Act").
There is a delay of 661 days in filing the present appeal.
An affidavit has been filed by Nitin Kishore, niece/legal
representative of the deceased assessee Shri Bhan Kishore,
explaining the reasons for the delay in his
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026