PALI TEXTILE COMMON EFFLUENT TREATMENT PLANT,JODHPUR vs. EXEMPTION WARD,JODHPUR, JODHPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a Section 8 company is not required to obtain registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, as clarified by the relevant state authority. Therefore, the rejection of the application on this ground was unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Section 8 company, applied for renewal of registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application because the assessee had not obtained registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959.
What were the issues?
Whether rejection of Section 12AB registration is valid if the assessee is not required to obtain registration under another applicable law, and whether prior registrations are relevant for renewal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Pali Textile Common Effluent Exemption Ward Treatment Plant Jodhpur Industrial Area Mandia Road, Pali-306401 PAN No. AACTP 9576 A Assessee by Amit Kothari, CA (Physical) Revenue by O.P. Meena, CIT-DR (Physical) Date of Hearing 11 / 08 / 2026. Date of Pronouncement 11 / 08 / 2026. PER BENCH: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee, Textile Common Effluent Treatment Plant, Pali, against the order dated 23.03.2026 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur [“Ld. CIT(E)”], whereby the assessee’s application seeking renewal/registration under section 12A/12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
One of the principal reasons given by the Ld. CIT(E) for rejecting the application is that the assessee has not obtained registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. According to the Ld. CIT(E), compliance with the 2 Asst. Year: 2026-27 requirements of other laws which are material for achieving the objects of the institution is one of the matters required to be examined while con
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026