SEVA MANDIR,JODHPUR vs. ITO EXEMPTION WARD 1, JODHPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E)'s premise regarding the lack of registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act appeared incorrect based on the evidence provided. The Tribunal also noted the assessee's grievance about not being afforded an adequate opportunity to present their case.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under section 12A/12AB of the Income-tax Act was rejected by the CIT(E) primarily for not being registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act. The assessee contended this was factually incorrect and that they possessed the necessary registrations and had provided all required documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee was registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act and if adequate opportunity was provided for presenting documents for 12A/12AB registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur [“Ld. CIT(E)”], whereby the assessee’s application seeking registration under section 12A/12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
One of the principal reasons given by the Ld. CIT(E) for rejecting the application is that the assessee was not registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, 1959. Apart from this, certain deficiencies/non-compliances in 2 Asst. Year: 2026-27 furnishing the requisite documents and details have also been referred to in the impugned order.
Before us, the learned counsel submitted that the aforesaid observation regarding non-registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026