AUSTIN EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,JODHPUR vs. CIT, EXEMPTION JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the objection regarding lack of registration was no longer valid as the assessee had obtained the required registration. It further held that the mere generation of surplus or construction on trustees' land does not, by itself, indicate a profit motive or diversion of funds.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an educational society, applied for approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act. The application was rejected by the CIT(E) primarily due to lack of registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, construction on land owned by trustees, and generation of substantial surplus.
What were the issues?
Whether the generation of surplus and construction on trustees' land are sufficient grounds to deny approval under Section 10(23C)(vi) without proof of profit motive or diversion of funds.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 18.03.2026 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur [“Ld. CIT(E)”], whereby the assessee’s application seeking approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
The material facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the assessee is an educational society engaged solely in imparting education and carrying on educational activities in accordance with its stated objects. The assessee had 2 Asst. Year: 2026-27 applied for approval under section 10(23C)(vi) of the Act, which was initially rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) vide order dated 31.03.2024, principally on the grounds that
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(23C)(vi)
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Sri Vijayadurga Educational Society, Kurnool vs Income Tax Officer (Exemptions), TirupatiITA 2006/HYD/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed18 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- DCIT Exemptions Circle 1(1), Kolkata vs South Point Education Society, KolkataITA 2169/KOL/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed11 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Ajanta Educational Trust, Amritsar vs CIT (Exemptions), ChandigarhITA 276/ASR/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2027-28
- Sunflower Academy of Education… vs DDIT, VisakhapatnamITA 363/VIZ/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed31 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026