ASHA LOK SANGEET VIKAS SANSTHAN,BARMER vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that while the assessee had not furnished complete details, substantial material was provided. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for a fresh examination to avoid foreclosing the assessee's claim.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AB was rejected by the CIT(E) primarily due to failure to substantiate the genuineness of its activities. The assessee had furnished some documents but admitted that complete supporting material was not provided.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AB solely on the grounds of incomplete documentation regarding the genuineness of activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated 25.12.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected.
The principal reason for rejection of the application by the Ld. CIT(E) is that, according to him, the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of its activities. The Ld. CIT(E) noted that an earlier application of the assessee had also 2 Asst. Year: NA been rejected and, during the present proceedings, various details and supporting documents were called for, inter alia, re
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026