SHRI DASHA SORATHIA VANIK NUTAN YOUVAK MANDAL,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3455/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 August 2026AY 2026-20274 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that it was appropriate to restore the application back to the CIT(E) for verification and disposal, considering the copy of the old registration certificate was eventually furnished.

What were the facts?

The assessee applied for renewal of registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application because the assessee could not furnish the old registration certificate issued under the old regime, which was issued 49 years prior.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of registration application for non-furnishing of an old, untraceable registration certificate was justified, and if principles of natural justice were violated.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI RAKESH KUMAR LODHA

For Appellant: Shri Jayendra Malavia
For Respondent: Shri Basavaraj, Shri Rajgopal
Hearing: 04.08.2026

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “G”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER And SHRI RAKESH KUMAR LODHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3455/MUM/2026 Assessment Year: 2026-2027 Shri Dasha Sorathia Vanik Commissioner of Nutan Youvak Mandal Income Tax (Exemption) Room No.601, 6th Floor, C/o: Shri Kantilal Nathalal Sopariwala Karyalaya, Cumballa Hill MTN Vs. 68, caveri cross land Telephone Exchange no.3, Kalbadevi., Building, Pedder Road, Dr Mumbai 400 002 Gopalrao Deshmukh Maharastra Marg, Mumbai 400 026 Maharastra PAN-AAATS1060Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee Represented by : Shri Jayendra Malavia Revenue Represented by : Shri Basavaraj Hiremath, CIT DR, a/w Shri Rajgopal Parthasarathi Date of Hearing : 04.08.2026 Date of Pronouncement : 11.08.2026. O R D E R PER : Shri Rakesh Kumar Lodha, Accountant Member This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order u/s 12AB of the Act, dated 12-02-2026, passed by

ITA No.3455/M/2026 SHRI DASHA SORATHIA VANIK NUTAN YOUVAK MANDAL

Ld. CIT(Exemption), Mumbai, vide DIN No. ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2025-26/1085933806. 2. The Assessee raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (The CIT(E)) erred in rejecting the application for granting registration U/s 12A of the Act on the ground of absence of registration U/s 12AA prior to 01.04.2021 under the old regime. 2. The learned CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application for registration without giving adequate opportunity of being heard OR submit required explanation and without giving any Show Cause OR specific opportunity as required by law before rejection, violating the principles of natural justice and hence, it is bad in law and lacks legal infirmity. 3. The learned CIT(E) erred in ignoring that in view of the changing trustees due to death and for some reason, though the Trust was registered under 12A Registration No. TR/26315, the certificate copy was not available and the Trust was claiming exemption U/s 12A for decades, which was allowed. Simply because the Registration Certificate is not traceable, it cannot be held that the trust had incorrectly obtained registration U/s 12AB for 5 years in Form 10AC, making the order bad in law which needs to be quashed as ab initio OR otherwise void and illegal. 4. The appellant craves leave to add to, amend and/or alter the above grounds of appeal. 3. Brief facts of the case are that Assessee has filed an application u/s 12A(1)(ac)(ii) for renewal of registration u/s 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in Form 10AB on 29-09-2025. 4. The Ld. CIT(E) issued notice calling for documents as per Rule 17A(2) and in compliance to that assessee has furnished relevant details and documents on 20-01-2026. However, assessee could not furnish old registration certificate issued under old regime u/s 12A of the Act, being not traceable as it was issued 49 years ago. Thus, Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for non furnishing of such

ITA No.3455/M/2026 SHRI DASHA SORATHIA VANIK NUTAN YOUVAK MANDAL

old registration certificate and also held that Assessee was not eligible for renewal of registration u/s 12AB vide certificate dated 24-09-2021 for the AY 2022-2023 to 2026-2027. 5. Before us, the Ld. Counsel furnished a copy of old registration certificate dt 22-9-1976 and submitted that it’s renewal of registration dated 24-09-2021, was in pursuant to old registration. 6. The Ld. CIT- DR accepted the factual position of submission of copy of old registration certificate. 7. We have considered the copy of old certificate of registration, dt. 22-09-1976, and hold that it is appropriate to restore back to Ld. CIT(E) for verification and disposal of application for renewal of registration. Accordingly, the grounds raised by the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 8. In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 11.08.2026.

Sd/- Sd/- (NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY) (RAKESH KUMAR LODHA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Sharath Kumar Private Secretary.

ITA No.3455/M/2026 SHRI DASHA SORATHIA VANIK NUTAN YOUVAK MANDAL

Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench

//True Copy// By Order Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →