ROGER FOUNDATION,AGRA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW, AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal. It was held that the order rejecting the Section 80G(5) application was consequential to the Section 12A registration. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal was filed with a significant delay. The delay was attributed to the pending proceedings related to the assessee's Section 12A registration, which had been set aside by the tribunal. The application for Section 80G(5) registration was consequential to the 12A registration.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal is justifiable due to pending consequential proceedings. Whether the rejection of Section 80G(5) registration is sustainable when the related Section 12A registration is under reconsideration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA (DB
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGH & BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER: BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, A.M. This assessee’s appeal is directed against the impugned dated 22.09.2025 passed on application No CIT Exemption, Lucknow/2025- 26/12AA/11485 by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(E)] u/s. 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), wherein ld CIT(E) has rejected granting approval of registration to assessee.
At the very outset, we note that the appellant has filed this appeal on 25.05.2026 with a delay of about 176 days. The ld AR filed a condonation petition explaining the reasons for the delay. It was submitted that in the case of the assessee, the application for regi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026