KISHAN BABA GHO SEWA SAMITI KALETARA,KISHAN BABA GHO SEWA SAMITI KALETARA vs. CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR, CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had provided substantial documentary evidence to prove the genuineness of its activities and charitable objects. The objections raised by the CIT(E) were found to be factually incorrect or not sustainable based on the evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable society focused on cow welfare, applied for registration under Section 12AB. The CIT(E) rejected the application, citing alleged availment of exemptions without registration, non-registration under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act, and non-genuineness of activities.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of Section 12AB registration was justified based on the grounds of alleged prior exemption availment, lack of public trust registration, and non-genuine activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 27.09.2025 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur, whereby the application filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected. The present appeal has been filed with a delay of 51 days.
At the outset, the learned counsel submitted that the delay had occurred because the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(E) was not communicated to the assessee and, therefore, the assessee was not aware of the passing of the 2 Asst. Year: 2025-26 order. It was only upon subsequent communication and knowledge of the impugned order that
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026