MAMATA AJILA,BANGALORE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BANGALORE
What were the facts?
A search action under section 132 was conducted on the assessee's premises, leading to the seizure of incriminating documents. The Assessing Officer (AO) subsequently issued notices under section 153C, making additions to the assessee's income. The assessee appealed against these additions.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a common satisfaction note for multiple assessment years vitiates the entire assessment proceedings, as per the jurisdictional High Court's decision. Additionally, the assessment for AY 2018-19 was incorrectly made under section 143(3) instead of section 153C.
What were the issues?
The primary issues were the validity of assessment proceedings initiated under section 153C due to a common satisfaction note and the AO's jurisdiction in issuing notices and making assessments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S & SHRI KESHAV DUBEY
Per Balakrishnan S, Accountant Member :
These appeals are filed by the assessee against the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax – Appeals – 11, Bengaluru, vide appeal Nos. as detailed below, for the Assessment Years 2014-15 to 2018-19, arising out of the order passed under section 153C r.w.s. 143(3) r.w.s. 153D dated 24.12.2019 for the Assessment Years 2014-15 to 2017-18 and 143(3) r.w.s. 153D dated 24.12.2019 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. ITA Nos.1981 to 1985/Bang/2025 2. Since the assessee is same, and the issues are common and identical, these appea
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1, JunagadhITA 836/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Late Hetalkumar Gunvantlal Soni (Through… vs ITO Ward 1(2)(3), AhmedabadITA 462/AHD/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreya Steel Corporation vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Revenue, Bally And Salkia Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Samir Halder vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Shaw vs. Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Ballygunge Charge And OrsCalcutta · 6 Oct 2026