DEEPAK BHUPATLAL PAREKH,MUMBAI vs. INT TAX WARD 3(3)(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5019/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 August 2026AY 2016-173 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. The withdrawal was permitted to avoid duplication and ensure comprehensive adjudication of all issues in the pending substantive appeal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act. The issues in this appeal were linked to a substantive appeal against the quantum assessment order under Section 143(3), which was pending before the CIT(A).

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be allowed to withdraw an appeal when its grounds are inextricably linked to a pending substantive appeal before a higher authority.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154,Section 143(3),Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA

PER SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The instant appeal of the assessee filed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax-(Appeals) ADDL/JCIT (A), Delhi [for brevity “Ld. CIT(A)”] order passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity ‘the Act’), for Assessment Year 2016-17, date of order 10.04.2026. The impugned order emanated from the order of the Ld. Deputy Commissioner of

ITA 5019/MUM/2026 DEEPAK BHUPATLAL PAREKH

Income Tax-circle 42(2)(1), Mumbai (for brevity ‘Ld. AO’), order passed under Section 154 of the Act, date of order 29.03.2023. 2. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessee seeks to withdraw the appeal for A.Ys. 2016–17 filed before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee filed a letter dated, which is placed on record. The relevant extract of the said letter is reproduced here in below: :SUB: WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. The above appeal is fixed for hearing today. The present appeal is against the order made under Section 154 of the Act. The grounds/issues raised in the appeal are inextricably linked with the quantum assessment order passed under Section 143(3) of the Act. The Assessee's substantive appeal against the assessment order under Section 143(3) for the same assessment year is currently pending for adjudication before the CIT(A) [NFAC]. In order to avoid duplication of the proceeding and to ensure that all issues arising out of quantum assessment are adjudicated in a comprehensive manner in the appeal pending before CIT(A) against Section 143(3) order, the Assessee may be allowed to withdraw the appeal filed before Your Honours with liberty to agitate all relevant grounds before the Ld. CIT(A) in the pending appeal.” 3. The Ld. DR had not made any objection against the Ld. AR’s submission. 4. We have considered the submissions of the Ld. AR and perused the withdrawal application placed on record. The assessee has sought withdrawal of the present appeal for A.Y. 2016–17 on the ground that the issues arising from the order passed under section 154 of the Act are inextricably linked with the quantum assessment made under section 143(3) of the Act, against which the substantive appeal is presently pending for adjudication before the Ld. CIT(A) [NFAC]. The assessee has, therefore, sought withdrawal of the present appeal with liberty to agitate the relevant grounds, as permissible in law, in the pending quantum appeal before the Ld. CIT(A).

ITA 5019/MUM/2026 DEEPAK BHUPATLAL PAREKH

5.

The Ld. DR has raised no objection to the request for withdrawal. Considering the reasons stated in the withdrawal application, we find no impediment in permitting the assessee to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the appeal filed by the assessee for A.Y. 2016–17 is dismissed as withdrawn. It is clarified that the withdrawal of the present appeal shall not prejudice the assessee’s right to raise such grounds before the Ld. CIT(A) in the pending quantum appeal as may be permissible in accordance with law. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No.5019/Mum/2026 is dismissed as withdrawal. Order pronounced in the open court on 12th day of August 2026 Sd/- Sd/- (ARUN KHODPIA) (ANIKESH BANERJEE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai,िदनांक/Dated: 12/08/2026 SAUMYA Sr.PS Copy of the Order forwarded to: 1. अपीलाथ�/The Appellant , 2. �ितवादी/ The Respondent. 3. आयकरआयु� CIT 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध, आय.अपी.अिध., मुंबई/DR, ITAT, Mumbai 5. गाड�फाइल/Guard file. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Asstt. Registrar), ITAT, MUMBAI

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →