THE SISTERS OF CHARITY EDUCATIONAL (BOMBAY) SOCIETY,MUMBAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the appeal to the file of the CIT(E) to decide the application afresh after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. The CIT(E) had denied registration on the grounds of non-furnishing of details as requested in a notice.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 12AB was rejected by the CIT(E) for non-furnishing of proof of activities. The assessee contended that all required documents were submitted and the opportunity provided was inadequate.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application for registration under Section 12AB without providing adequate opportunity and proper specification of deficiencies. Whether the assessee had furnished all requisite documents and proofs of activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD & SHRI MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR
PER SHRI CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the learned CIT(E), Mumbai, dated 25.03.2026 in denying registration under section 12AB of the Act.
ITA 4296/MUM/2026 THE SISTERS OF CHARITY EDUCATIONAL (BOMBAY) SOCIETY 2. In spite of issue of notice, none appeared on behalf of the assessee nor any adjournment was sought. We dispose of the appeal after hearing the learned DR.
The assessee has raised the following grounds:-
“Ground - A. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(E) (the “AO”) erred in rejecting application u/s 12AB of the Act on the ground of non-furnishing of proof of activities. B. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the CIT(E) failed to appreciate that i. The assessee had duly furnished all requisite documents, information, and evidences as required. ii. The AO dismissed the application without issuing show cause notice to the assessee thus without providing an opportunity to the assessee iii. AO did not specify any particular deficiency OR shortcoming in the submissions made by the assessee, arbitrarily dismissed the application. iv. AO failed the appreciate that the assessee has submitted all the relevant supporting and proofs towards the activities undertaken by the trust. C. The Appellant therefore prays that application for registration may be approved.” 4. On perusal of the order passed by the learned CIT(E), it is noticed that the registration under section 12AB of the Act was denied to the assessee on the ground that the assessee could not provide the details as requested in the notice dated 12.01.2026. It is also observed from the order of the learned CIT(E) that the assessee filed its submissions on 03.02.2026 and 17.02.2026. In the grounds of appeal raised before us, the assessee contended that the assessee had furnished all the requisite details/documents/information as required. It was also the contention of
ITA 4296/MUM/2026 THE SISTERS OF CHARITY EDUCATIONAL (BOMBAY) SOCIETY the assessee that the learned CIT(E) dismissed the application of the assessee after providing inadequate opportunity to the assessee.
Taking the totality of the facts into consideration, we deem it appropriate to restore this appeal to the file of the learned CIT(E), who shall decide the application for registration under section 12AB of the Act afresh in accordance with law after providing adequate opportunity to the assessee.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 12/08/2026
Sd/- Sd/- MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Dated: 12/08/2026 Prabhat
ITA 4296/MUM/2026 THE SISTERS OF CHARITY EDUCATIONAL (BOMBAY) SOCIETY
Copy to: THE SISTERS OF CHARITY EDUCATIONAL (BOMBAY) SOCIETY, THE SISTERS OF CHARITY 1 EDUCATIONAL (BOMBAY) SOCIETY P. BALU MARG PRABHADEVI ,MUMBAI, MUMBAI-400025, MAHARASHTRA CIT (EXEMPTIONS), 6TH FLOOR, MTNL TE BUILDING, 2 CUMBALLA HILL, PEDDER ROAD, MUMBAI, MUMBAI-400026, MAHARASHTRA 3 THE PCIT / CIT, 4 THE D.R., ITAT, MUMBAI BENCH 5 GUARD FILE
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026