ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 5 3 1 MUMBAI, MUMBAI vs. VARUN GLOBAL LIMITED, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A)'s deletions were conditional upon verification by the Assessing Officer, not unconditional. The Tribunal clarified the operative effect of the CIT(A)'s directions for limited verification by the AO.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed the CIT(A)'s order deleting additions made on account of mismatch between Form 26AS and return of income, and disallowance under Section 69C for salary expenses. The assessee provided reconciliations for both issues.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) was justified in deleting additions without clear findings on verification, and whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable due to tax effect below the monetary limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “F” BENCH MUMBAI
PER MAKARAND VASANT MAHADEOKAR, AM:
This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi
2 Varun Global Limited [“learned CIT(A)”], under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”], for the assessment year 2018-19. The impugned appellate order arose from the assessment order dated 30.09.2021 passed under section 143(3) of the Act.
The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69C
- Jitendrakumar Bhikhabhai Shrimali, Mehsana vs ITO Ward 1, MehsaanaITA 1290/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sonu Jain, Agra vs ITO WD(1)(1)(2), AgraITA 671/AGR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mritunjay Singh, Kudra vs AO, SasaramITA 454/PAT/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-2018
- Shantilal Mafaji Kachchhava, Banaskantha vs ITO WD 1 Palanpur, PalanpurITA 2256/AHD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Madhusudhan Gade, Nizamabad vs ITO., Ward-1, NizamabadITA 379/HYD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026