SHRI KRISHNA GO SEWA SAMITI, GUDA BACHARAJ,PALI vs. CIT(E), JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the rejection based on a procedural defect (incorrect sub-clause selection) was not sustainable, especially when the assessee was acting under liberty granted by a previous Tribunal order. The subsequent registration under the Rajasthan Public Trusts Act also removed a key deficiency.
What were the facts?
The assessee's applications for regular registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G were rejected by the CIT(E) due to filing under an incorrect sub-clause and lack of registration under the Rajasthan Public Trusts Act. The assessee had previously been granted provisional registration and approval.
What were the issues?
Whether rejection of registration and approval applications due to a procedural error in form selection, despite substantive eligibility and previous Tribunal directions, is justified. Whether the assessee's failure to register under the Rajasthan Public Trusts Act was a valid ground for rejection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON’BLE & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE
PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur [“Ld. CIT(E)”], whereby the applications filed by the assessee in Form No. 10AB seeking regular registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G(5) of the Income- tax Act, 1961 have been rejected. Since both the appeals arise from the same set of facts and the issue of approval under section 80G is consequential to Asst. Year: NA registration under section 12AB, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order.
The relevant facts,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026