DHARMA SAMRAT SWAMI KARPATRIJI MAHARAJ PUBLIC WELFARE TRUST,BIKANER vs. CIT EXEMPTION, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the matter deserved to be examined afresh as the assessee did not get an effective opportunity. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for approval under section 80G was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) without providing an adequate opportunity. The assessee claimed they could not furnish submissions and documents due to certain circumstances and requested another opportunity.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) rightly rejected the 80G approval application without affording adequate opportunity to the assessee. Whether the assessee should be granted a fresh opportunity to submit documents and explanations.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER BENCH: The aforesaid appeal has been filed by the assessee against the impugned order dated 28.10.2024 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Jaipur, rejecting the assessee’s application seeking approval under section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. Before us, the Ld. Counsel submitted that the application has been rejected without affording adequate and effective opportunity to the assessee. In response to the show-cause notice issued by the Ld. CIT(E), the assessee, due to certain circumstances, could not furnish the requisite submissions and supporting
2 Asst. Year: 2025-26 documents. It was submitted that, if one more opportunity is granted, the assessee is ready and willing to furni
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026