MALUR NANJAIAH GAYATHRI,BANGALORE vs. ITO WARD-2(1)(1) BLR, BANGALORE
What were the facts?
Assessees, employees of BSNL, opted for a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) which was essentially a retrenchment scheme. They received compensation and leave encashment, and sought exemptions under Sections 10(10B) and 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the retrenchment compensation received by BSNL employees is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B) and that the entire leave encashment is eligible for exemption under Section 10(10AA), including the enhanced limit. The Tribunal also condoned the delay in filing appeals before the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether retrenchment compensation and leave encashment received by BSNL employees under VRS are eligible for exemption under the Income Tax Act, and whether delays in filing appeals should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE
BEFORE SHRI BALAKRISHNAN S., ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K., JUDICIAL MEMBER
Assessment Appeal No. Appellant Respondent Year Malur Nanjaiah Gayathri, No. 1034, 1st Main, The Income Tax Manasa Nagar, ITA No. Officer, Nagarbhavi S.O., 2020-21 1980/Bang/2026 Ward – 2(1)(1), Bangalore North, Bangalore. Bengaluru – 560 027. PAN: ACKPG6825D
Maralavadi Lingasetty Kyathasetty, The Income Tax 311, Brindavana, Officer, 2020-21 ITA Nos. 2311 & 7th Main Road, Ward – 1(1), & 2312/Bang/2026 3rd Cross, Lalithamahal Nagar, Mysore. 2021-22 Mysuru – 570 028. PAN: AFMPK9854M
Mandya Jaderudraswamy Rajesh, The Income Tax 147, 5th Cross, 17th Main, 2020-21 ITA Nos. 2350 & Officer, C-Zone, Kuppaluru, 3rd Stage, & 2351/Bang/2026 Ward – 2(4), J P Nagar, 2021-22 Mysuru. Mysore – 570 008. PAN: ACBPR9254Q
Prasanna, D.No-89/6, Rajathadri The Income Tax ITA No. Shankarnagar Junior College Officer, 2020-21 2408/Bang/2026 Road, Ward – 1(1), Mangaluru – 575 015. Mangalore. PAN: ACMPP4750C
Pujar Jayanna, The Income Tax ITA No. 1966/25, 9th Cross, Officer, 2020-21 2546/Bang/2026 SS Layout A-Block, Ward – 1, Davanagere. Davangere.
Page 2 o
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Bibhasa Jena vs. The Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar CommissionerateOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- M/S Otd Logistics Express Private Limited vs. The Commissioner CGST Cx And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Sangram Mallik vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And CustomsOrissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Amitabh Samal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Cuttack 1Orissa · 9 Oct 2026
- Atul Kumar vs. The SuperintendentUttarakhand · 8 Oct 2026