SHREE PRAGY VATSALYAYATAN SANSTHA,AJMER vs. ITO WARD EXEMPTION, UDAIPUR, UDAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeals should be disposed of with specific directions for each category of deficiency. The Tribunal emphasized that the restored proceedings should be limited to the precise deficiency that led to the impugned order, not a wholesale fresh enquiry.
What were the facts?
The appeals were filed by various assessees challenging orders passed by the CIT(E) rejecting their applications for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The assessees were primarily charitable trusts and educational societies seeking registration to claim exemptions.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the grounds for rejection of registration under Section 12AB, including verification of trust deeds, genuineness of activities, and procedural defects, and whether these necessitated a complete remand or a limited enquiry.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
S. ITA No. Asst. Year ASSESSEE RESPONDENT PAN No. Assessee by Revenue By No.
ITA N A SHREE BHUWAL CIT(E), JAIPUR ABATS8495E RISHABH O.P. MEENA CIT- 497/JODH/2025 MATAJI GAUSHALA RANGA, CA DR (PHYSICALLY) SANSTHA, VILLAGE (VIRTUALLY) BIRAMI, TEHSIL LUNI, DIST. JODHPUR-342027
ITA N A SHREE BHUWAL CIT(E), JAIPUR ABATS8495E RISHABH O.P. MEENA CIT- 498/JODH/2025 MATAJI GAUSHALA RANGA, CA DR (PHYSICALLY) SANSTHA, VILLAGE (VIRTUALLY) BIRAMI, TEHSIL LUNI, DIST. JODHPUR-342027
ITA N.A. SHREE MAHADEV CIT(E), JAIPUR ABYAS4225K NONE O.P.MEENA-CIT- 513/JODH/2025 GOSHALA SAMITI, DR (PHYSICALLY) 182, BERO KA BAS, TANAWADA, KHARA BERA, PUROHITAN, DIST. JODHPUR-342802
ITA N. A. SHREE MAHADEV CIT(E), JAIPUR ABYAS4225K NONE O.P.MEENA-CIT- 514/JODH/2025 GOSHALA SAMITI, DR (PHYSICALLY) 182, BERO KA BAS, TANAWADA, KHARA BERA, PUROHITAN, DIST. JODHPUR-342802
ITA N/A SHRI VISHNU CIT(E) JAIPUR ABCTS6407Q J.K. JASMATIYA O.P.MEENA-CIT- 703/JODH/2025 BHAGWAN CA DR (PHYSICALLY) MANDIR TRUST, (VIRTUALLY) C/O PRAKASH GOPAL VORA, BRAH
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026