SHREE HARLAL JAT CHATRAVAS VIKAS SANSTHAN,BARMER vs. CIT EXEMPTION JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the substantive claim for registration should be examined on merits, as the assessee had attempted to surrender the provisional registration and had now filed under the correct clause. The rejection based on a procedural defect was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee had provisional registration under section 12A(1)(ac)(vi) and applied for regular registration under section 12AB using an incorrect clause due to a technical issue with the income-tax portal's surrender facility. The CIT(E) rejected the application on this technical ground.
What were the issues?
Whether an application for registration under section 12AB can be rejected solely on the grounds of being filed under an incorrect clause when the assessee faced technical difficulties in surrendering prior provisional registration and has now filed under the correct clause.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, HON’BLE & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE
PER BENCH: These two appeals have been filed by the assessee against the respective orders passed by the learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Jaipur [“Ld. CIT(E)”], whereby the assessee’s application for registration under section 12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential application for approval under section 80G have been rejected. Since both the appeals arise out of the same set of facts and involve interconnected issues, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. Asst. Year: NA
The brief facts are that the assessee had earlier been granted provisional registration under clause (vi) of secti
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026