GANGA VANIJYA PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PCIT, KOLKATA 2, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. As there was no objection from the Revenue, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act. During the hearing, the assessee sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal filed against an order under Section 263.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH KOLKATA
BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.2148/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2020-21 Ganga Vanijya Pvt. Ltd………..………………....…………………....Appellant C/o. Subash Agarwal & Associates, Advocates, Siddha Gibson, 1, Gibson Lane, Suite 213, 2nd Floor, Kolkata- 700069. [PAN: AACCG4918Q] vs. PCIT, Kolkata 2….……....…..………………….…..... Respondent Appearances by: Siddharth Agarwal, Adv, on behalf of the assessee. Sanjit Kumar Das, CIT DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing :July 07, 2026 Date of pronouncing the order : August 14 ,2026 आदेश / ORDER Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03.03.2025 of the Office of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax(hereinafter referred to as “ld. CIT(A)”) passed under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).
At the time of hearing, the Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the assessee seeks permission to withdrawal this appeal, to which, the Ld.
I.T.A. No.2148/Kol/2025 Senior DR did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Kolkata, the 14th August, 2026. Sd/- Sd/- [Rajesh Kumar] [Pradip Kumar Choubey] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 14 .08.2026. DC Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant - 2. Respondent - 3.CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR),
//True copy// By order Deputy Registrar, Kolkata Benches
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026