MANISHKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PATEL,NA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, citing principles of natural justice. The CIT(A) was directed to provide a hearing opportunity to the assessee, who was also instructed to ensure participation.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 27,89,935/- to the assessee's income. The assessee's first appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A) ex-parte as the assessee failed to appear for hearings.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) order passed ex-parte without proper service of notice, despite assessee's specific request for physical notices, is sustainable. Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by the order of first-appeal dated 27.02.2026 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-Addl/JCIT(A), Panaji [“Ld. CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of the assessment-order dated 06.11.2017 passed by learned ITO, Ward-3, Navsari [“Ld. AO”] u/s 144 r.w.s. 147 of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2012-13, the Manishkumar Rameshbhai Patel ITA No. 553/SRT/2026 - AY 2012-13
assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the Ld. AO, on the basis of information
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026