MANSI GEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,SURAT vs. ITO WARD 1(1)(3), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were barred by limitation and without jurisdiction, following the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal. Consequently, the reassessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case for AY 2015-16 was reopened under Section 147 based on information about an alleged accommodation entry of Rs. 3,62,12,000/-. Notices for reopening were issued after April 1, 2021, which the assessee challenged as time-barred.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of reassessment notices issued after April 1, 2021, for Assessment Year 2015-16, considering the provisions of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Per B.M. Biyani, AM:
Feeling aggrieved by order of first appeal dated 14.08.2025 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [“CIT(A)”], which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 18.05.2023 passed by learned Assessment Unit of Income-tax Department [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment- Year [“AY”] 2015-16, the assessee has filed this appeal. Mansi Gems Private Limited
The background facts leading to present appeal are as under:
(i) The assessee-company filed return of income of AY 2015-16 declaring a total income of Rs. 5,79,540/- u/s 139 which was duly
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026