PRADNYASHODH SEWA SAMITI FOUNDATION,PUNE vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a recent amendment by the Finance Act, 2024, allows applications to be filed at any time after the commencement of activities. Therefore, the rejection based on the previous time limit was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for registration under Section 80G(5) after the expiry of their provisional approval. The CIT(E) rejected the application due to the delay in filing.
What were the issues?
Whether the application for registration under Section 80G(5) was filed within the prescribed time limit, considering the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE & SHRI Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE
आदेश /ORDER
PER Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, A.M : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune [Ld. CIT(E)] rejecting the application u/s 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Findings and Analysis:
We have heard both the parties and perused the record. In this case, the assessee had filed an application in Form No. 10AB for registration u/s 80G(5) of the Act on 29.09.2025. The assessee’s application has been rejected by the Ld. CIT(E). The relevant paragraph No. 5 of the Ld. CIT(E) is reproduced as under : “5. Without prejudice to the above, it is seen that the date of expiry of provisional approval under section 80G(5)(iv) of the Act in the instant case is 31/03/2025. As per the provisions of clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, where a trust or institution has been
ITA No. 2099/PUN/2026
provisionally approved under section 80G(5)(iv) of the Act, the application for regular approval under section 80G(5)(iv) is required to be filed, at least six months prior to expiry of period of the provisional approval or within six months from the date of commencement of activities, whichever is earlier. Since, the period of provisional approval was due to expire on 31/03/2025, the present application was required to be filed before 30/09/2024. However, the present application filed is on 29/09/2025 i.e. after the expiry of period allowed under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. Thus, it is seen that the assessee has failed to file the present application within the time limit allowed under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.”
Thus, in this case, the Ld. CIT(E) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee on account of delay in filing of the application. Section 80G(5) of the Act is a beneficial provision. It is also observed that by Finance Act, 2024 an amendment has been introduced in the form of proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. The relevant amendment is reproduced here as under : “[(iv) 17[***] where activities of the institution or fund have— (A) not commenced, at least one month prior to the commencement of the previous year relevant to the assessment year from which the said approval is sought; (B) commenced, at any time after the commencement of such activities:]”
Thus, it can be observed that by the amendment brought in Finance Act, 2024, Parliament in its wisdom has allowed assessee to file application for registration u/s 80G “at any time” after the commencement of activities. This amendment explains the intention of Parliament to allow assessee to file an application at any time after commencement of activities. Therefore, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(E) to Ld. CIT(E) with a direction to consider the application on merits and decide the case on merits. Accordingly, grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.
ITA No. 2099/PUN/2026
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 17th August, 2026
Sd/- Sd/- (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (Dr. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे/Pune; दिन ांक/Dated : 17-08-2026 Ravi Kumar Digitally signed by Ravi Kumar Date: 2026.08.17 12:46:50 Ravi Kumar +05'30' आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. The concerned Pr. CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘B’ Bench, Pune 5. ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Assistant Registrar आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
More judgments on Section 80G(5)
- Nikunj Mahendrabhai Adani, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-1(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2026/AHD/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1491/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- The Divine Life Society, Jaipur vs Exemption Ward 1, JaipurITA 1484/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026