GOPALJI GANESHPRASAD VAISHYA,VASHI vs. ASSESSING OFFICER, VASHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 6127/MUM/2026Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 August 2026AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because it was a duplicate filing.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2017-18. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal, stating that two appeals were inadvertently filed against the same order due to a technical issue.

What were the issues?

Whether an appeal can be withdrawn if it was inadvertently filed twice due to a technical error during e-filing.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “J(SMC

Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH & SHRI JAGADISH

For Respondent: Ms. Jayshree Thakur- SR. DR
Hearing: 17.08.2026Pronounced: 17.08.2026

Per: SHRI JAGADISH, A.M.:

1.

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 16.04.2025 passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [‘Ld. CIT(A)’], for the Assessment Year 2017–18, arising from the assessment order passed under section 147 read with section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’).

ITA No.6127/M/2026 Gopalji Ganeshprasad Vaishya

2.

The assessee, vide letter dated 12.08.2026, has sought permission to withdraw the present appeal. It is stated that two appeals, being ITA No. 6127/Mum/2026 and ITA No. 6615/Mum/2026, were inadvertently filed against the same impugned order due to a technical issue encountered during e-filing and that the present appeal may, therefore, be permitted to be withdrawn.

3.

We have heard the learned Departmental Representative and perused the assessee’s letter as well as the material available on record. Since both appeals arise from the same impugned order, the assessee’s request is accepted and permission to withdraw the present appeal is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open court on 17/08/2026.

Sd/- Sd/- (PAWAN SINGH) (JAGADISH) Accountant Member Judicial Member

Mumbai, Dated: 17/08/2026 Ashwani Rao Sr. Private Secretary

ITA No.6127/M/2026 Gopalji Ganeshprasad Vaishya

Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT (Appeals) 5. The DR, I.T.A.T. By order

(Assistant Registrar) ITAT, Mumbai

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →