USHA,CHARKHI DADRI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CHARKHI DADRI
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns the taxability of the interest component of land acquisition compensation. The lower authorities assessed this interest as income from other sources, invoking specific sections of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the interest received under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is an accretion to the compensation and not income from other sources. Therefore, it should not be taxed as such.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether the interest component of land acquisition compensation is taxable as income from other sources or is part of the enhanced compensation exempt under Section 10(37).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 28,Section 57(iv),Section 56(1)(a),Section 145A(b),Section 10(37),Section 45(5),Section 56(2)(viii),Section 143(3),Section 263,Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: “SMC” NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA
This assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2019-20, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short, the “CIT(A)/NFAC”], Delhi’s DIN and order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1087385323(1), dated 15.03.2026 involving proceedings under section 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). Case called twice. None appears at the assessee’s behest. She is accordingly proceeded ex-parte.
Delay of 5 days in filing of the assessee’s instant appeal is condoned in larger interest of justice and in light of Collector, Land & Acquisition vs. Mst. Katiji & Others (1987) 167 ITR 471 (SC).
It emerges during the course of hearing that the sole substantive iss
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 28
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- The Vijapur Taluka Co-Operative Purchase… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PatanITA 925/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- ACIT, Circle-4, Patna vs Amit Kumar Singh, PatnaITA 95/PAT/2020[2015-16]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT Circle-4, Patna vs Amit Kumar Singh, PatnaITA 88/PAT/2020[2017-18]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Vishal Oil and Lubricants Co vs The Commissioner of Customs (Import)W.P.(C)-7004/202628 Sept 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026