MAHADEVI,MATHURA vs. ITO, WARD 4(3)(4), HATHRAS
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment framed without issuing a notice under Section 143(2) in response to a belatedly filed return is bad in law and void ab initio. Therefore, the reassessment order was quashed.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings as the assessee did not file a return of income. The assessee later filed a return, which the AO treated as invalid. The AO made additions based on property purchase and stamp duty value, without issuing a notice under Section 143(2) for the belatedly filed return.
What were the issues?
Whether an assessment framed under Section 147/148 without issuing a notice under Section 143(2) for a belatedly filed return is valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 148,Section 143(2),Section 147,Section 144,Section 69,Section 56(2)(x)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA(SMC
Before: SUNIL KUMAR SINGHBRAJESH KUMAR SINGH
PER:BRAJESH KUMAR SINGH, A.M.
This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 25.02.2026 passed in appeal No NFAC/2018-19/10348019 by the National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) [hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A) ] u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for the A.Y. 2019-20, wherein ld CIT(A) has dismissed assessee’s appeal.
Brief facts of the case: The AO on perusal of the e-filing portal and 360 degree data of the assessee found that the assessee had not filed her return of income for AY 2019-20. The AO had information that the assessee had purchased an immovable property at a value of Rs. 6,30,000/- on 24.07.2018 which had a stamp duty value of Rs. 11,91,000/-. Accordingly, the AO issued not
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026