ARUN BHAGAWAT BHAGAT,NARAYAN NAGAR, HONDA, SATTARI vs. WARD-1(1), PANAJI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for AY 2019-20. Subsequently, a duplicate appeal was registered. The assessee requested to withdraw the duplicate appeal as the original appeal had already been adjudicated.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee can withdraw an appeal that has been registered as a duplicate of an already adjudicated appeal.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH “SMC”, PANAJI
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
आदेश / ORDER
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 17.10.2025 passed by Ld. Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Visakhapatnam [‘Ld. CIT(A)’] for the assessment year 2019-20.
2 ITA No.82/PAN/2026
When the appeal was called for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the appellant-assessee despite due service of notice of hearing. However, the assessee filed an application seeking withdrawal of the above captioned appeal. The relevant portion of the said application is reproduced herein below :-
“The appellant filed his appeal for the assessment year 2019-20 manually on 19.01.2026. The Registry assigned No. ITA 37/PAN/2026. By objection dated 28.01.2026 and 09.02.2026 the appellant was required to submit digitally signed memorandum of appeal online which was complied with on 11.02.2026. The Registry assigned a new number ITA 82/PAN/2026. As of consequence there is a duplicate appeal ITA 82/PAN/2026 appear to have been registered. The appeal No. ITA 37/PAN/2026 having already been adjudicated by order dated 01.07.2026 the appellant submits the duplicate appeal No. ITA 82/PAN/2026 may please be treated as withdrawn and dismissed.”
Ld. DR raised no objection to permit the withdrawal of the above captioned appeal. 4. In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the above captioned appeal. Accordingly, the above captioned appeal stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.
3 ITA No.82/PAN/2026
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands dismissed as ‘withdrawn’. Order pronounced on this 18th day of August, 2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (MANISH BORAD) (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Panaji / Dated : 18th August, 2026. Sujeet/DOC Sujeet Kumar Digitally signed by Sujeet Kumar Sharma Sharma Date: 2026.08.19 11:12:49 +05'30' आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Visakhapatnam. 4. The Pr. CIT/CIT concerned. 5. DR, ITAT, Panaji. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6. आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER, // True Copy // Assistant Registrar/Sr.PS ITAT, Panaji.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026