RAJARAM NARAYAN PATIL,MUMBAI vs. ITO, WARD 1, MARGAO, MARGAO
What were the facts?
Employees of BSNL received amounts under a Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) in 2019. The assessee claimed this amount as retrenchment compensation, eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B) of the Income Tax Act.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the amount received by BSNL employees under the VRS is in the nature of retrenchment compensation and is a capital receipt exempt from tax under Section 10(10B) of the Act. The CIT(A)'s findings were set aside.
What were the issues?
Whether the amount received under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme is retrenchment compensation eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B) or falls under Section 10(10C).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH, ‘SMC’ PANAJI
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
Assessee(s) by : Shri Tanzil Padvekar (virtual) Revenue by : Shri Mayur Kamble Date of hearing : 17.08.2026 Date of pronouncement : 18.08.2026
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, AM : The captioned two appeals at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Yrs. 2020-21 and 2021-22 are directed against the separate orders framed by Addl/JCIT(A) (ld. NFAC) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act 1961. 2. The common issue raised by the assessee in these two appeals is that whether the amount received by the employees of Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) on account of retirement under the BSNL Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019 is in the nature of retrenchment compensation and a Capital Receipt, eligible for exemption u/s.10(10B) of the Act.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submit
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(10B)
- Kishorchandra Girdharlal Joshi, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 613/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 559/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Shantilal Maganbhai Kalani, Amreli vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 3(1)(4), AmreliITA 558/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 498/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Lakhman Shir, Jamnagar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2), JamnagarITA 497/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smti Gollo Sarah vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 8 Oct 2026
- Abhiram Ayodhyanath Swami vs. Union Of INDIA, Dept. Of Revenue, Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 8 Oct 2026
- Shankar Prasad Gupta vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Balaram Halder vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026
- Biswa Nath Mondal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 8 Oct 2026