FATEMA AMIR BHAGAT,CHENNAI vs. INCOEMR TAX OFFICER, DAMAN WARD, DAMAN

ITA 338/SRT/2026Status: DisposedITAT Surat18 August 2026AY 2013-144 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's explanation for the delay, citing her husband's involvement in corruption and her subsequent unawareness of the proceedings. The matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee did not file returns for multiple assessment years, leading to ex-parte assessment orders with significant additions. The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed due to a substantial delay.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the appeal decided on merits, considering the assessee's circumstances.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 144,Section 147,Section 148

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT

Before: MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE & SHRI B.M. BIYANI

For Appellant: Shri Kamlesh Bhatt, CA
For Respondent: Shri Ashish Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 17.08.2026Pronounced: 18.08.2026

Heard together (4 matters)

ITA No.334/SRT/2026
ITA No.336/SRT/2026
ITA No.338/SRT/2026
ITA No.340/SRT/2026

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

PER : SUCHITRA KAMBLE, J M: These appeals filed by the assessee are against the orders passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [in short “CIT(A)”] even dated 30.01.2026 for the Assessment Years (in short “AY”) from 2011-12 to 2014-15. As the facts are identical in these appeals, we hereby pass a consolidated order by taking ITA No.333/SRT/2025 pertaining to A.Y. 2011-12 as the lead case.

2.

The assessee has raised the following ground of appeal:

ITA No.333/SRT/2026 & Ors. Fatema Amir Bhagat

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →