INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION), AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ANJUMAN ISLAMIA TRUST, ANJUMAN ISLAMIA SCHOOL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the audit report in Form 10B was obtained and filed by the auditor within the prescribed time. The delay in acceptance/approval of the report was considered a procedural lapse, not a substantive failure that would disentitle the assessee from claiming exemption.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed its return of income claiming exemption under Section 11. The exemption was denied by the CPC under Section 143(1) due to the belated filing of the audit report in Form 10B. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption, holding that Form 10B was filed within the due date for filing the return.
What were the issues?
Whether the belated acceptance/approval of Form 10B, which was otherwise filed within the due date by the auditor, disentitles the assessee from claiming exemption under Section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 11,Section 12,Section 12A(1)(b),Section 143(1),Section 139(1),Section 139(4A)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, MP
Before: HON’BLE SHRI KUL BHARAT & SHRI G.D. PADMAHSHALI
PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI; The DIN & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1068763813(1) dt. 18/09/2024 passed by the Addl./Jnt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal-5, Chennai [‘Ld. CIT(A)/NFAC’] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act [‘the Act’] for assessment year 2022-23 [‘AY’] is challenged by the Revenue u/s 253(2) of the Act on the following grounds;
ITAT-Jabalpur ITO(E) Vs Anjuman Islamia Trust ITA No. 165/JAB/2024 AY: 2022-23
Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in observing that the assessee filed the Form 10B on 29/09/2022 whereas the assessee has actually filed the form 10B on 07/11/2022 as evide
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026