CHETAK TILES PVT LTD,CHITTORGARH vs. ACIT CIRCLE-2, UDAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that only the profit element on unaccounted purchases can be added to income, not the entire purchase amount. The assessee had voluntarily offered income to the extent of profit on unaccounted purchases.
What were the facts?
The assessee's assessment was reopened based on information from a search operation on the Yashika Group, which revealed the assessee had unrecorded purchases from this group. The Assessing Officer made an addition of Rs. 11,46,487/- on account of these unrecorded purchases.
What were the issues?
Whether the entire amount of unrecorded purchases can be added to income, or only the profit element thereof. Whether adverse materials were properly confronted to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR
PER: SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY; V.P. :
Captioned appeal by the assessee arises out of order dated 27-10-2025 passed by National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the Assessment year 2020-21. 2. The short issue arising in the appeal relates to addition of an amount of Rs.11,46,487/-. Of course, the assessee has raised a ground challenging the validity of reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’). However, at the time of hearing, assessee did not 2 advance any argument in respect of the said ground. Hence, the ground is dismissed as not pressed.
Insofar as merits of the addition is concerned, briefly the facts are, the assessee is a resident corporate entity. Bas
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026