THOMAS STEPHENS KONKNNI KENDR,PORVORIM vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BENGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 232/PAN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Panaji19 August 20263 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order denying approval under Section 80G(5). The assessee subsequently filed a letter seeking withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal filed by the assessee should be dismissed as withdrawn.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G(5)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PANAJI BENCH, ‘DB’ PANAJI

Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE

For Respondent: Shri Narasimharaju M
Hearing: 19.08.2026Pronounced: 19.08.2026

PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :

The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee is directed against the order dated 26.06.2025 framed by CIT (Exemption) denying grant of approval u/s.80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).

2 Thomas Stephens Konknni Kendr

2.

When the case called for, none appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, assessee has filed a letter dated 18.08.2026 seeking withdrawal of appeal. Ld. DR has no objection for the same.

3.

We therefore permit the assessee to withdraw the appeal filed by it and dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’.

Order pronounced on this 19th day of August, 2026. (VINAY BHAMORE) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Panaji; दिन ांक / Dated : 19th August, 2026. Satish Digitally signed Satish by Satish Kumar Kumar Madishetty Date: 2026.08.19 Madishetty 17:48:46 +05'30'

3 Thomas Stephens Konknni Kendr

आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेपिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपील र्थी / he Appellant. 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent.

2.3.

The Pr. CIT concerned. विभ गीय प्रतितनधि, आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, Panaji 4. ‘DB’ Bench / DR, ITAT, Panaji ‘DB’ Bench ग र्ड फ़ इल / Guard File. 5. आिेश नुस र / BY ORDER,

////

More judgments on Section 80G(5)

All 2,236 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G(5) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →