VENKATESHWAR BALAJI SUSHIL MAHESHWARI SEWA TRUST,DELHI vs. CIT(E), DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and remanded the issue back for fresh consideration. The assessee is to provide the trust deed and be given an opportunity to be heard, with evidence to be considered.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected the application, stating the trust was involved in religious activities and did not meet the prescribed conditions.
What were the issues?
Whether the trust's activities qualify for approval under Section 80G, and if the rejection by the CIT(E) was based on sufficient findings regarding the nature of the trust's activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: MS MADHUMITA ROY & SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY
INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5048/Del/2026 Venkateshwar Balaji Vs. Commissioner of Sushil Maheshwari Sewa Income Tax (Exemption) Trust, 365 Gagan Vihar, Delhi Gagan Vihar, Delhi- 110051, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AABTV6548H
Assessee by : None Revenue by: Shri Rajesh Mahajan
Date of Hearing 22/06/2026 Date of pronouncement 19/08/2026
O R D E R PER MADHUMITA ROY, JM:
The instant appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the
order dated 18.03.2026passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax
(Exemptions), Delhi, whereby and whereunder the application made in
Form No. 10AB for approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act,
1961, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) by the appellant trust stood
rejected.
Since the applicant is involved in the religious activities and not
fulfilled the conditions prescribed under Section 80G of the Act, the
assessee does not qualify for approval under Section 80G of the Act
and application under Form 10AB for approval under Section 80G of
the Act was stood rejected upon the Ld. CIT(E). Whereas it is the case
2 ITA No. 5048/Del/2026 Venkateshwar Balaji Sushil Maheshwari
of the assessee that no activity is carried out for the benefit of any
particular caste/religion and the activities are also performed other
than religious and, therefore, the assessee is entitled to the claim
under Section 80G of the Act. No such findings of activities are wholly
or substantially religious is forthcoming from the order impugned.
Thus, we set aside the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for
consideration afresh on the basis of the trust deed to be filed by the
assessee and upon giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to
the assessee and upon considering the evidences on record.
In the result, appeal filed by the is allowed for statistical
purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 19/08/2026.
Sd/- Sd/- (KRINWANT SAHAY) (MADHUMITA ROY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Dated: 19/08/2026 R. Naheed, Sr PS Copy forwarded to 1. Applicant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, New Delhi
3 ITA No. 5048/Del/2026 Venkateshwar Balaji Sushil Maheshwari
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mascot Constructions Co. And Another vs. The Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (GST) And AnotherBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026