I HOME AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED,DELHI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 28, DELHI, DELHI
What were the facts?
Proceedings under Section 153C were initiated against the assessee based on documents found during a search on a third-party group. The key issue was the validity of jurisdiction for assessment years 2014-15, 2015-16, and 2016-17, particularly concerning the date of search initiation and the applicability of Section 153C(3).
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that for assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16, the assessments were barred by limitation as they fell outside the 6-year block period from the deemed date of search. For assessment year 2016-17, proceedings under Section 153C were quashed as the deemed date of search fell after April 1, 2021, making Section 153C(3) inapplicable.
What were the issues?
Whether the Assessing Officer validly assumed jurisdiction under Section 153C for the relevant assessment years, considering the deemed date of search and the applicability of Section 153C(3) which restricts its application for searches initiated on or after April 1, 2021.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 153C,Section 153C(3),Section 147,Section 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI SUDHIR KUMAR
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
These appeals of the assessee arises out of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Delhi-25 [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] in Appeal Nos. 1913 to 1915/Del/2026 for A.Ys. 2014- 15 to 2016-17 even dated 12.12.2025 which in turn arises out of the order passed by the Assessing Officer, DCIT, Circle-28, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’) passed u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated e
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 132
- Piyush Maheshwari, Kota, Rajasthan vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1529/JPR/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 49/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 48/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 47/PUN/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Pandhari Ashruji Gaikwad, Aurangabad vs DCIT Central Circle 2 Aurangabad, AurangabadITSSA 46/PUN/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Bisleri International PVT.LTD, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner, Central Revenue Building, BhubaneswarOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Saraswat Infra And Projects, Sundergarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- Kamalakanta Nayak vs. The State Tax Officer, Mayurbhanj Circle,BalasoreOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Vedvyas Logistics Private Limited, Sundargarh vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 7 Oct 2026
- M/S Harilal Agarwalla vs. State Tax Officer, Kendrapara CircleOrissa · 7 Oct 2026