JOGDHIAN HARI BHAGWAN RASTOGI CHARITABLE MEMORIAL TRUST,DELHI vs. ITO WARD EXEMPTION 1(4), DELHI
What were the facts?
The assessee trust sold an immovable property for Rs. 11.90 crores and invested the sale proceeds in mutual funds, fixed deposits, and savings accounts. The Assessing Officer disallowed deduction under Section 11(1A) for amounts held in fixed and savings accounts, considering them ineligible.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that amounts kept in scheduled bank accounts, whether savings or fixed deposits, qualify as compliance for claiming exemption under Section 11(1A) of the Act. The duration of the deposit is immaterial for it to be considered a new capital asset.
What were the issues?
Whether fixed deposits and savings bank accounts maintained from sale proceeds of a capital asset qualify as investment in a new capital asset for exemption under Section 11(1A), and if the duration of the deposit is a determining factor.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “F”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI M. BALAGANESH & SHRI VIMAL KUMAR
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
The appeal of the assessee arises out of the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. CIT(A)’, in short] in Appeal No. 8317/Del/2025 for A.Y. 2013-14 dated 07.10.2025 which in turn arises out of the order passed by the Assessing Officer, ITO, Ward (Exemption 1(4), Delhi (hereinafter referred to as ‘ld. AO’) passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) dated 29.06.2022. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal before us: - Jogdhian Hari Bhagwan Rastogi C M Trust “1. That the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 11(1A)
- Shree Harikrushna Velfare Trust, Bhachau vs The ITO Exemption Ward 1, Rjakot, RajkotITA 677/RJT/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Lrg Naidu Educational and Charitable Trust… vs CIT Exemptions, ChennaiITA 2768/CHNY/2026[-]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026
- Valliappa Foundation, Salem vs CIT(E), ChennaiITA 2260/CHNY/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Valliappa Foundation, Salem vs CIT(E), ChennaiITA 2259/CHNY/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- The Somaiya Trust, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward 2(4)…ITA 4057/MUM/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. S.G. Fab vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Meghnath Kapri vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Nithil Agarwal vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 6 Oct 2026
- Navneet Singh vs. The State Of Jharkhand Through Chief Secretary, Government Of JharkhandJharkhand · 6 Oct 2026