SIDDHIVINAYAK MINERALS RESOURCES PRIVATE LIMITED,KATNI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD,1, KATNI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and restored the matter to the AO. The AO is directed to verify the genuineness of the cash sales by making necessary inquiries from the purchasers and decide the issue afresh after providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee company declared a total income of Rs.89,980/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs.47,25,915/- under Section 69A for alleged unexplained cash receipts from various parties, and an additional Rs.51,079/- due to balance differences. The CIT(A) upheld these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether cash receipts from parties, confirmed by them, can be treated as unexplained money when the assessee claims they are from normal business transactions and are duly accounted for.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH “SMC”, JABALPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT
PER KUL BHARAT, VICE PRESIDENT.:
This appeal, by the assessee, is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) dated 21.09.2023 pertaining to the assessment year 2017-18. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: -
“1. Under the facts and in the circumstances of the case, learned CIT(Appeals) erred, in confirming addition of Rs.3420616/- received from M/s Kanha Trading Co. as unexplained money in the, hand assessee while appellant is a company , its accounts are duly audited ;all receipts are in the normal course of business and appellant
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 69A
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026